213 research outputs found

    Ranking with Submodular Valuations

    Full text link
    We study the problem of ranking with submodular valuations. An instance of this problem consists of a ground set [m][m], and a collection of nn monotone submodular set functions f1,,fnf^1, \ldots, f^n, where each fi:2[m]R+f^i: 2^{[m]} \to R_+. An additional ingredient of the input is a weight vector wR+nw \in R_+^n. The objective is to find a linear ordering of the ground set elements that minimizes the weighted cover time of the functions. The cover time of a function is the minimal number of elements in the prefix of the linear ordering that form a set whose corresponding function value is greater than a unit threshold value. Our main contribution is an O(ln(1/ϵ))O(\ln(1 / \epsilon))-approximation algorithm for the problem, where ϵ\epsilon is the smallest non-zero marginal value that any function may gain from some element. Our algorithm orders the elements using an adaptive residual updates scheme, which may be of independent interest. We also prove that the problem is Ω(ln(1/ϵ))\Omega(\ln(1 / \epsilon))-hard to approximate, unless P = NP. This implies that the outcome of our algorithm is optimal up to constant factors.Comment: 16 pages, 3 figure

    Improved Online Algorithm for Weighted Flow Time

    Full text link
    We discuss one of the most fundamental scheduling problem of processing jobs on a single machine to minimize the weighted flow time (weighted response time). Our main result is a O(logP)O(\log P)-competitive algorithm, where PP is the maximum-to-minimum processing time ratio, improving upon the O(log2P)O(\log^{2}P)-competitive algorithm of Chekuri, Khanna and Zhu (STOC 2001). We also design a O(logD)O(\log D)-competitive algorithm, where DD is the maximum-to-minimum density ratio of jobs. Finally, we show how to combine these results with the result of Bansal and Dhamdhere (SODA 2003) to achieve a O(log(min(P,D,W)))O(\log(\min(P,D,W)))-competitive algorithm (where WW is the maximum-to-minimum weight ratio), without knowing P,D,WP,D,W in advance. As shown by Bansal and Chan (SODA 2009), no constant-competitive algorithm is achievable for this problem.Comment: 20 pages, 4 figure

    Admission Control to Minimize Rejections and Online Set Cover with Repetitions

    Full text link
    We study the admission control problem in general networks. Communication requests arrive over time, and the online algorithm accepts or rejects each request while maintaining the capacity limitations of the network. The admission control problem has been usually analyzed as a benefit problem, where the goal is to devise an online algorithm that accepts the maximum number of requests possible. The problem with this objective function is that even algorithms with optimal competitive ratios may reject almost all of the requests, when it would have been possible to reject only a few. This could be inappropriate for settings in which rejections are intended to be rare events. In this paper, we consider preemptive online algorithms whose goal is to minimize the number of rejected requests. Each request arrives together with the path it should be routed on. We show an O(log2(mc))O(\log^2 (mc))-competitive randomized algorithm for the weighted case, where mm is the number of edges in the graph and cc is the maximum edge capacity. For the unweighted case, we give an O(logmlogc)O(\log m \log c)-competitive randomized algorithm. This settles an open question of Blum, Kalai and Kleinberg raised in \cite{BlKaKl01}. We note that allowing preemption and handling requests with given paths are essential for avoiding trivial lower bounds
    corecore